environment court evidence

That is not to say that town planners may not be called to give evidence in other courts, such as the Land Court, the Magistrates Court, or the Supreme Court. From Trustpower’s perspective this is particularly so given the existing Regional Water Plan has yet to give effect … Forms & the fees you’ll need to pay if you make an application in the Environment Court, including how to pay the fees. Environment Court decisions of public interest are added to this site as they are released. In that regard, I confirm that this evidence is written within my expertise, except where I state that I am relying on the evidence of another person. This evidence is prepared in accordance with the 2014 Note. During McClellan J’s tenure as Chief Judge of the Court, his Honour encouraged I have been a Director of Terra Nova Planning since establishing the consultancy in 2001. Fleur Maseyk – Rebuttal Evidence 10 Table 1: Summary table of issues raised by technical experts during the appeal process and consequent mediation, caucusing, or in evidence to the Environment Court. Agreement which is attached to the evidence of Ms Myers. the Environment Court Practice Note and that I agree to comply with the code. Title: Evidence - Environment Court Author: Tony McLauchlan Created Date: 5/26/2014 5:54:25 PM These rules determine what evidence must or must not be considered by the trier of fact in reaching its decision. I confirm that I have considered all the material facts that I am aware of that might alter or detract from the opinions that I express, and that this evidence is within my area of expertise, in the Environment Court Practice Note (2014) and I agree to comply with it. It is not a set of inflexible rules, but is a guide to the practice of the Court and … Before the Environment Court at Auckland. The law of evidence, also known as the rules of evidence, encompasses the rules and legal principles that govern the proof of facts in a legal proceeding. Biodiversity - Planning Evidence - Clare Barton, Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Fleur Maseyk, Biodiversity - Planning Evidence - Helen Marr, Biodiversity - Planning Evidence - Lynette Wharfe, Biodiversity - Planning Evidence - Shane Hartley, Biodiversity - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Clare Barton, Biodiversity - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Helen Marr, Biodiversity - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Shane Hartley, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - Amy Hawcroft, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - David le Marquand, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - Lyn Neeson, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - Matiu Park, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - Philippe Gerbeaux, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - Richard Petersen, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - Robert Schofield, Biodiversity - Technical Evidence - Spencer Clubb, Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Amy Hawcroft, Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - David le Marquand, Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Matiu Park, Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Philippe Gerbeaux, Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Robert Schofield, Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Spencer Clubb, Land - Planning Evidence - Lynette Wharfe, Land - Planning Evidence - Phillip Hindrup, Land - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Lynette Wharfe, Land - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Phillip Hindrup, Land - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Phillip Percy, Land - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Shane Hartley, Land - Technical Evidence - Andrew Barber, Land - Technical Evidence - Jack McConchie, Land - Technical Evidence - Lindsay Fung - Appendix One, Land - Technical Evidence - Russell Death, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Andrew Barber, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Chris Keenan, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Garth Eyles, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Jack McConchie, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Lindsay Fung, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Norm Ngapo, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Russell Death, Land - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Stuart Ford, Land - Technical Supplementary Evidence - Andrew Barber, Landscapes - Planning Evidence - Clare Barton, Landscapes - Planning Evidence - Irene Clarke, Landscapes - Planning Evidence - Robert Schofield, Landscapes - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Clare Barton, Landscapes - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Irene Clarke, Landscapes - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Robert Schofield, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - Alison Mildon, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - Brad Coombs, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - Clayton Delmarter, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - Clive Anstey, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - Frank Boffa, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - J P Stevenson-Wright, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - Richard Matthews, Landscapes - Technical Evidence - Stephen Brown, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Gerard Willis, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Chris Hansen, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Chris Hansen - Attachment, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Clare Barton, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Gerard Willis - Appendix 1, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Helen Marr, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Lynette Wharfe, SWQ - Planning Rebuttal Evidence - Shane Hartley, SWQ - Planning Supplementary Evidence - Chris Hansen, SWQ - Planning Supplementary Evidence - Gerard Willis, SWQ - Planning Supplementary Evidence - Helen Marr, SWQ - Planning Supplementary Evidence - Helen Marr - Appendix 2, SWQ - Technical - Further information from Jon Roygard and Maree Clark, SWQ - Technical - Further Technical Evidence of Anthony Rhodes and Jeremy Neild, SWQ - Technical - Jon Roygard and Maree Clark response to Ledgard 2nd Supplementary Statement, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Jon Roygard and Maree Clark, SWQ - Technical - 2nd Supplementary Evidence - Stewart Ledgard, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Andrew Hoggard, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Antony Roberts, SWQ - Technical Evidence - John Ballingall, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Jon Rogyard, Kate McArthur & Maree Clark, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Mike Scarsbrook, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Olivier Ausseil, SWQ - Technical Evidence -Peter Loveridge, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Sonia Whiteman, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Stewart Ledgard, SWQ - Technical Evidence - Terry Parminter, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Alison Dewes, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Alison Dewes - Appendix A, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Andrew Barber, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Andrew Barber - Appendix, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Andrew Bashford, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Andrew Day, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Chris Keenan, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Dan Marsh, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Dave Kelly, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Doug Edmeades, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - John Ballingall, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Lindsay Fung, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Mike Scarsbrook, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Neels Botha, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Olivier Aussiel, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Peter Taylor, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Russell Death, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Sean Newland, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Stewart Ledgard, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Stuart Ford, SWQ - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Terry Parminter, SWQ - Technical Supplementary Evidence - Alison Dewes, SWQ - Technical Supplementary Evidence - Antony Roberts, SWQ - Technical Supplementary Evidence - Jon Roygard, SWQ - Technical Supplementary Evidence - Olivier Ausseil, SWQ - Technical Supplementary Evidence - Sean Newland, SWQ - Technical Supplementary Evidence - Stewart Ledgard, Infrastructure Climate Resilience Projects, One Plan as Amended by Plan Change 1 (2016), One Plan as Made Operative (December 2014), Decisions on Submissions to the Proposed One Plan (August 2010). I record that I have read and agreed to abide by the Environment 1.4 The purpose of attending this hearing meeting is to reiterate and expand upon the While not a kind of evidence you’d use in court, this kind of evidence can be … The matters addressed by my evidence are … 4. Act and Rules - Main Page Parties. My evidence in this statement is within my area of expertise, and I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter to detract from the opinions which I express. The court hears environmental, development, building and planning disputes. In a civil court case, the yardstick is a “preponderance of evidence.” In practice, this means a greater than 50 percent chance that an allegation has been proven. Scope of Evidence 5. I have read the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses in the Environment Court’s 2014 Practice Note and agree to comply with it. I confirm that the opinions I have expressed represent my true and complete professional opinions. Proceedings in the Environment Court will often involve a territorial authority or regional council (also called local authorities). Biodiversity - Planning Evidence - Clare Barton Download. Expert Witnesses in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014 and I agree to comply with it. supplied to the Court, dated 28 August 2014. 64 44. Otago Regional Council Plan Changes 1, 7 & 8; Wellington International Airport; America's Cup Direct Referral; Marine Spatial Planning - Bay of Plenty IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 142(2)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL ... evidence, in legal submissions to … This evidence is within my area of expertise except where I state that I am relying on facts or information provided by another person. The below file names are sorted by Environment Court reference number and contain the following information: Environment Court reference - appellant name - expert witness name Alliance Group - Evidence in chief - Doyle Richardson (PDF, 286.1KB) Notice to the Profession - Amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada (January 2021) Guide to the 2021 Amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada Fees and Disbursements Notices to the Profession. Environment Court cases online » Matters before the Environment Court with a high level of public interest or a large number of interested parties, have case information published online. A woman tells Hobart court she was on couple’s yacht the night Bob Chappell went missing Susan Neill-Fraser is serving a 23-year jail sentence for the murder of partner Bob Chappell. Environment Court; Overview of the Environment Court’s processes; About the Environment Court; Representing yourself in the Environment Court; Forms & fees; Environment Court cases online. In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf. I have resided on Waiheke Island for the last twenty years. My earlier evidence referred the Environment Court’s Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses as specified in the Environment Court’s Consolidated Practice Note 2011. I have held expert witness status in the Environment Court on areas of the Maori interest for many years, and have given evidence in that capacity in relation to cases on Waiheke such as the Owhiti Bay case. 12 The data, information, facts and assumptions I have considered in forming my opinions are set out in my evidence. I have complied with the Code of Conduct when preparing my written statement of evidence and will do so when I give oral evidence. SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PRIMARY EVIDENCE OF SHANE ALEXANDER HARTLEY ON BEHALF OF MIDDLEMISS FARM HOLDINGS LTD AND THE BUCKLAND LANDOWNERS GROUP 28 September 2020 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 My name is Shane Alexander Hartley. Analogical Evidence. Virtually all important processes and decisions under the Resource Management Act 1991, such as regional policy statements, regional and district plans, resource consents and Water Conservation Orders, may be appealed to the Environment Court. Anyone who uses the information in these decisions needs to comply with the conditions or other legal obligations governing access, release, storage and re-publication. Environment Court of New Zealand Practice Note 2014 This guide to practice in the Environment Court will come into effect on 1 December 2014 and replaces all earlier Practice Notes. 4. Environment Court’s response to relevant appeals; proposing that the Auckland Council approach is highly relevant (and able to be imported) to Waikato District2. Biodiversity - Technical Rebuttal Evidence - Fleur Maseyk Download. IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ... in her statement of evidence, it is appropriate for renewable electricity generation to be recognised and provided for in PC7. The following evidence was presented to the Environment Court hearing of One Plan appeals. Sometimes the Court may order the evidence is not to be published. The Supreme Court observed that unless and until the procedure under Order XLI Rules 27, 28 and 29 are followed, the parties to the appeal cannot be permitted to lead additional evidence … Scope of Evidence The trier of fact is a judge in bench trials, or the jury in any cases involving a jury. Evidence to the Environment Court. contained in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014. I confirm that I have considered all the material facts that I am aware of that might alter or detract from the opinions I express. However, the Planning and Environment Court is unique in its approach to expert evidence and it is the court in which planning evidence is most regularly called. The following evidence was presented to the Environment Court hearing of One Plan appeals. The programme will generally include a list of the unresolved issues, a timetable for the filing and exchange of evidence and an estimate of hearing time. The Practice Note 2014 is not a set of inflexible rules but is a guide to the practice of the Environment Court and will be followed unless there is good reason not to. The reasons for the Where there is disagreement a brief statement of position is provided. I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from the opinions that I express. 1.9 I confirm that I have read the Code of Conduct for expert witnesses contained in the Environment Court Practice Note and that I agree to comply with it. Biodiversity. I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from the opinions expressed. v. State , … Priority track: Cases that require priority attention (in terms of priority resolution or more intense case management) are assigned to a Priority Track. The Environment Court has a substantially larger role than the Planning Tribunal, with expanded functions and powers over planning, resource consents and enforcement. I reiterate that I understand that the Code of Conduct requires me to assist the Court impartially on matters within my expertise, and not to advocate for Auckland Transport (‘AT’). EXPERT EVIDENCE IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT Use of Experts in the Land and Environment Court 43. Environment & Chapter 22 Rural Zone. Environment Court’s Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses, and that my evidence has been prepared in accordance with it. 5. Reliance was placed upon Dharampal and Anr. 5.3 My evidence addresses the submissions made by Middlemiss relating to the Rural chapters of the PWDP (the Submission includes a qualifying statement Legislative references are to the Resource Management Act 1991. Decisions The Land and Environment Court was established in 1980 as the first specialist superior environmental court in the world. Lonnie Dalzell – Owner Interface Manager [PDF, 400 KB], Anthony Adams – Construction Methodology [PDF, 1.7 MB], David Dunlop – Traffic and Transport [PDF, 744 KB], Campbell Stewart – Erosion and Sediment Control [PDF, 349 KB], Richard Chilton – Air Quality [PDF, 1.2 MB], David Hughes – Stormwater Management [PDF, 24 MB], Dr Jack McConchie – Hydrology [PDF, 30 MB], Keith Hamill – Water Quality [PDF, 481 KB], Justine Quinn – Freshwater Ecology [PDF, 3.9 MB], Dr Matthew Baber – Terrestrial Ecology [PDF, 5.4 MB], Joshua Markham – Terrestrial Offset and Compensation [PDF, 2.7 MB], Boyden Evans – Natural character [PDF, 14 MB], Damien McGahan – Planning – statutory assessment [PDF, 612 KB], Tim Watterson - Project Design [PDF, 27 MB], Lindsay Poutama - Ngāti Raukawa ki te Tonga / Ngāti Kauhwata [PDF, 222 KB], James Kendrick - Ngāti Kahungunu Ki Tāmaki Nui-a-Rua [PDF, 216 KB], Manahi Paewai Rangitāne o tamaki nui-a-rua [PDF, 5.5 MB], Manahi Paewai Rangitāne o tamaki nui-a-rua – Supplementary evidence [PDF, 1.3 MB], This page was last updated: 24th June 2020, Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway Project, Campbell Stewart – Erosion and Sediment Control, Joshua Markham – Terrestrial Offset and Compensation, Damien McGahan – Planning – statutory assessment, Lindsay Poutama - Ngāti Raukawa ki te Tonga / Ngāti Kauhwata, James Kendrick - Ngāti Kahungunu Ki Tāmaki Nui-a-Rua, Manahi Paewai Rangitāne o tamaki nui-a-rua, Manahi Paewai Rangitāne o tamaki nui-a-rua – Supplementary evidence. ENV-2013-AKL-000174 Evidence of Allen Edwin Davies Witnesses (Environment Court Practice Note 2014). The Court held that such report may be used as evidence only when it is tendered into evidence or is exhibited by any witness. Prior to the appointment of an expert the Court Practice Notes require that parties consider whether expert evidence is necessary to resolve the dispute. View court lists Contact the Court Forms and fees This practice note was revised in 2014. 6.

Sammy's Fish Box App, Looney Tunes World Of Mayhem Tweety, 2019 Zurich Classic Results, Beach Themed Quilts, Ship Cove To Furneaux Lodge, Middletown Elementary School Yearbook,